12/08/2026
OUR RESPONSE
We don’t normally discuss individual customer matters publicly. However, following recent posts concerning our garage, and having been unable to respond directly because comments have subsequently been disabled, I feel it is only fair that we are given the opportunity to set out our side.
I want to do that without insults, accusations or a social-media argument.
These are simply the events as we understand them, supported where possible by our records and the engineering inspection report. I am happy for people to read both sides and make up their own minds.
For reasons of professionalism and customer privacy, we will not identify the customer concerned.
The customer initially telephoned our workshop and spoke with our Workshop Manager regarding concerns with her vehicle.
She was invited to attend the garage so that we could discuss the problems she was experiencing and try to help establish what might be required.
The customer attended and the interaction was friendly. Our technicians carried out an initial inspection free of charge.
That initial inspection identified several matters requiring further investigation.
The vehicle had been presented with a reported concern of poor and sluggish starting. During a road test, the clutch was found to be slipping. The battery was also found to be at approximately 50% state of charge.
Importantly, the report did not claim that every possible fault had been conclusively diagnosed.
It recommended replacement of the clutch assembly and, because removal of the gearbox would be required, inspection of the starter motor at the same time for possible clutch-dust contamination, obstruction, damage or deterioration. It also recommended that the battery be fully charged and properly tested.
The engineering report concludes:
“Initial testing was provided free of charge.”
Following this initial consultation, the customer was invited back for an official booking so that further diagnostic work could be carried out, the exact fault or faults established and an appropriate quotation provided.
That further diagnostic booking did not take place.
The customer subsequently informed us that members of her family were unhappy with us, and the booking was cancelled.
During the earlier conversation, we had been asked for an indication of what the repair might cost if the clutch and flywheel ultimately required replacement.
An approximate figure in the region of £1,000–£1,500 was discussed, subject to further investigation and confirmation of exactly what was required.
That was an estimate of a potential repair scenario, not a formal quotation, because the additional diagnostic work necessary to establish the complete repair had not yet been carried out.
At this point:
No repair work had been authorised or carried out.
No formal quotation had been issued.
No charge had been made for the initial inspection.
Further testing had been recommended before confirming the complete repair required.
THE SUBSEQUENT INCIDENT AT OUR GARAGE
The situation unfortunately escalated when a member of the customer’s family subsequently attended the garage.
Having now reviewed our CCTV and audio recording of that interaction, I am satisfied that the manner in which my staff were approached was unacceptable.
The family member entered the workshop area and confronted members of staff in an extremely angry and aggressive manner. During the exchange, she was rude and verbally abusive towards members of our team and repeatedly gave them very little opportunity to explain the circumstances, despite their attempts to do so.
During that confrontation, she also made reference to getting her partner involved.
Given the aggressive nature of the exchange and the context in which that statement was made, members of staff interpreted it as an intimidating remark and a potential threat of further confrontation.
I want to be precise here: I am not claiming that an explicit threat of physical violence was made if those words were not actually used. I am explaining how the remark was reasonably perceived by the members of staff who were on the receiving end of the confrontation.
She also demanded that I telephone her on Monday, despite not leaving a telephone number with the garage for me to contact her.
This was particularly disappointing because, up until that point, our involvement had consisted of trying to assist the customer. We had carried out an initial inspection without charge, produced a written engineering report and invited her back for further testing before providing a definitive diagnosis and formal quotation.
My staff deserve the same basic courtesy and respect that we expect them to show every customer.
We will always listen to a complaint. We will explain our actions, investigate concerns and accept responsibility where we have genuinely got something wrong.
What we will not accept is members of our staff being subjected to abusive, aggressive or intimidating behaviour simply for attempting to do their jobs.
THE SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS
I subsequently became aware that posts concerning our business had appeared on Facebook.
At that stage, I had not even had the opportunity to speak properly with all the members of staff involved and establish the facts for myself.
I therefore responded politely and explained that I would investigate what had happened, speak with my team and get back to the customer.
I believe that was the responsible thing to do rather than reacting publicly before establishing the facts.
Since then, comments on the relevant posts have been disabled. Despite contacting the administrators, I have therefore been unable to publicly provide the other side of the story in the same place where the allegations have been made.
A NOTE REGARDING ANONYMOUS COMMENTS
I have also seen a number of comments made anonymously regarding our business.
I want to be very clear about this.
We are an open and transparent business, and I genuinely welcome customers bringing concerns, complaints or problems directly to us.
No garage gets everything right every single time. If we have made a mistake, I want to know about it. Give us the opportunity to investigate it, establish what happened and, where appropriate, put it right.
However, we cannot meaningfully investigate an allegation from somebody who remains anonymous and provides us with no information that allows us to identify the vehicle, repair, invoice or circumstances being referred to.
That leaves us unable to check our records, speak with the technicians involved, examine the work carried out or offer any meaningful response.
It also means that neither we nor the people reading those comments have any practical way of establishing their context or accuracy.
So my invitation to anybody posting anonymously about a genuine experience with our business is simple: please contact me directly.
Identify yourself, tell me which vehicle or job you are referring to and give me the opportunity to investigate it properly.
You don’t have to agree with me, and I won’t attempt to silence legitimate criticism. I simply ask that if an allegation is made about our business, we are given a fair opportunity to establish the facts and respond to it.
FINALLY
I fully respect anybody’s right to complain about our business.
We will not always get everything right, and when we make a mistake, I expect us to acknowledge it and put it right.
But fairness works both ways.
In this particular case, we carried out an initial inspection without charge, documented what we found, recommended further investigation and invited the customer back so those tests could be completed before a proper quotation was produced.
That appointment was cancelled before we had the opportunity to do so.
We are prepared to stand behind the written engineering report and the evidence we have retained.
I would also genuinely welcome the opinion of an appropriately qualified independent motor-vehicle engineer if the technical findings themselves are disputed.
I’m not asking anybody to simply take our word for it.
I’m asking for the same fairness, honesty and transparency that any customer would rightly expect from us.
Read what has been said. Read our account. Look at the engineering report. Then make your own mind up.
Thank you for taking the time to read our side of the story.
Dave Massey
Massey Motor-group